Limited VRAM does not mean experiments must be trivial. It means the training setup must be designed deliberately. Every choice affects memory, speed, numerical stability and the size of model that can be tested.
Mixed Precision
Mixed-precision training stores and computes many values using lower-precision formats while keeping selected operations in higher precision. This can reduce memory use and increase throughput, particularly on modern GPUs.
Gradient Accumulation
When a desired batch does not fit in memory, several smaller micro-batches can contribute to one optimizer update. This approximates a larger batch without storing the full batch at once.
Activation Checkpointing
Checkpointing saves memory by discarding selected intermediate activations during the forward pass and recomputing them during backward propagation. Memory consumption decreases, but the extra computation makes training slower.
| Technique | Main benefit | Main cost |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed precision | Lower memory, higher speed | Numerical care |
| Gradient accumulation | Larger effective batch | More steps per update |
| Checkpointing | Lower activation memory | Extra compute |
| Shorter context | Large memory reduction | Less long-range information |
What I Will Measure
- Peak VRAM use
- Tokens processed per second
- Training loss per unit of compute
- Wall-clock time
- Validation performance
Practical Order of Operations
I will first establish a stable baseline. Then I will enable mixed precision, measure the difference, add accumulation only when needed, and use checkpointing after verifying that the speed tradeoff is worthwhile.